Re: Climate Change Not The Cause of Neanderthal Extinction


"David" <pchristainsen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:b8589dcb-fa33-400d-8078-9bada9ccee62@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Jan 6, 5:42 am, Paul Murray <p...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 2009-01-05, David <pchristain...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:> On Jan 5, 10:45 am,
Peter Alaca <p.al...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
That is because you are not interested in archaeology,
not in sci.archaeology or in any other group you post to,
not in other people, en not in what other people write.
You are only interested in yourself.
THREADS -

"Top 8 of 2008: Archaeological Discoveries Related
to the Bible"
"Thiering Plan of Qumran"

[snip]

So what?
All you do is set some sort of Google alert for news stories
vaguely connected to archaeology, then post them here with no
commentary or value added.
All you are interested in is seeing your name again and again
in the post list, so that you can later (as you did here) claim
that this somehow makes you worthwhile.

David Christainsen the replied: Go to the back of the bus with the silly
freaks and the newagers...

Paul Murray accused you of simply reposting, without any added value, news
stories having vague connections to archaeology, so that you can see your
name again and again. He further supplied a motive for that conduct:
egoism ("excessive concern for oneself with or without exaggerated feelings
of self-importance").

You do realize, David, that every time you blow off those type of
accusations in the way that you blew off Paul's post, you dig yourself
deeper into the cemetery of "Zero Credibility"? As important as thinking
that you are smart, important and correct is to you, one would think that
you would want to avoid this sort of behavior, which makes you look stupid,
unimportant and generally wrong.

Just some constructive criticism ...

Steve
--
The above posting is neither a legal opinion nor legal advice,
because we do not have an attorney-client relationship, and
should not be construed as either. This posting does not
represent the opinion of my employer, but is merely my personal
view. To reply, delete _spamout_ and replace with the numeral 3


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Buried under Cirencesters Kingshill site is Roman farmhouse
    ... have got at the moment but we do think there is Roman archaeology down ... The above posting is neither a legal opinion nor legal advice, ... Well, David, it's like this. ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Buried under Cirencesters Kingshill site is Roman farmhouse
    ... Roman life in Cirencester had been uncovered ... have got at the moment but we do think there is Roman archaeology down ... What do you think that you are gaining by posting of the sort you posted. ... The above posting is neither a legal opinion nor legal advice, ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Buried under Cirencesters Kingshill site is Roman farmhouse
    ... Roman life in Cirencester had been uncovered ... have got at the moment but we do think there is Roman archaeology down ... The above posting is neither a legal opinion nor legal advice, ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: The Issue of Ireland and NW Europe.
    ... yourself) of racism because of their posting habit, ... archaeology, worth posting anyway. ... I am free to criticize sceince and not ... have considered the critique more carefully. ...
    (sci.archaeology)
  • Re: Spirit Pond, Maine
    ... You seem to think that peer review means "error free." ... The above posting is neither a legal opinion nor legal advice, ... >> The above posting is neither a legal opinion nor legal advice, ... >> represent the opinion of my employer, ...
    (sci.archaeology)