Re: Buried under Cirencester's Kingshill site is Roman farmhouse


"crunch" <pchristainsen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:89aad41c-8d2e-40e6-8dd3-6eb40fb638c9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Aug 6, 3:22 pm, "Steve Marcus" <smarcus_spamo...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
"crunch" <pchristain...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

news:4bc1338f-4d64-47ec-9333-40f366e126c1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Aug 6, 11:41 am, Peter Alaca <p.al...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:





crunch <pchristain...@xxxxxxxxx> 06/08/2009 17:19 wrote:

http://www.wiltsglosstandard.co.uk/news/4532803.Cirencester_s_Roman_p...

"A Bronze Age burial mound dating back
to 2,000BC complete with skeleton was found.

It was described as Cirencester's
'most significant' historical find.

Ken Welsh, senior project manager at Oxford
Archaeology, confirmed more evidence of
Roman life in Cirencester had been uncovered
this week."

David Christainsen

"We have only just started on the site so we don?t quite know what we
have got at the moment but we do think there is Roman archaeology down
there," he said.

We don?t quite know what it is at the moment but
we do think there is news down there, Carl.
Christainsen wrote: "Make it David, pal."

What do you think that you are gaining by posting of the sort you posted.
Do you think that these sorts of posts establish you as having any special
expertise or abilities in archaeology? News flash: they do not.
Essentially, the simply make you a spammer. Note my signature. In my spare
time, I just may decide to take your spamming up with the appropriate
authorities.

Steve
--
The above posting is neither a legal opinion nor legal advice,
because we do not have an attorney-client relationship, and
should not be construed as either. This posting does not
represent the opinion of my employer, but is merely my personal
view. To reply, delete _spamout_ and replace with the numeral 3- Hide
quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Christainsen wrote: What do you think you are gaining by being a busybody?

David Christainsen

Well, David, it's like this. You are spamming this newsgroup, by posting
items that you are mischaracterizing. You are wasting peoples' time, and
you are wasting bandwith. If you keep it up, I may just decide to pursue
the matter with your ISP, and if you try to play the "rotating ISP game with
me," I may decide to give some of my friends a call. Those friends work for
Uncle Sam, as I used to.

And by the way, what *do* you think you are gaining by posting as you do,
except in your warped mind the abilitiy to tell others that you are a
"player" in archaeology and lead many discussion groups in sci.archaeology.

Again, David, take note of my signature. I'm not playing around
--
The above posting is neither a legal opinion nor legal advice,
because we do not have an attorney-client relationship, and
should not be construed as either. This posting does not
represent the opinion of my employer, but is merely my personal
view. To reply, delete _spamout_ and replace with the numeral 3 .

Steve



.

Relevant Pages