Re: The atmosphere on sci.arch has improved a bit

On Aug 17, 8:55 am, crunch <pchristain...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Aug 16, 2:44 am, Kendall K Down <webmas...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:





In message <6d00a225-16e8-4b35-827a-8820d09f1...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
ups.com>
          crunch <pchristain...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

In the academic world Dr. Barbara Thiering
MUST be judged by the scholarly rules of
evidence, no matter where it leads.

Yes, and the evidence is that she is a nutcase who has misinterpreted
the evidence and gone way beyond it to reach conclusions no other
scholar accepts.

Ken Down

--
================ ARCHAEOLOGICAL DIGGINGS ===============
|     Australia's premier archaeological magazine      |
|            http://www.diggingsonline.com  ;        |
========================================================

No, her scholarly evidence is on her official
Pesher of Christ website -

http://www.pesherofchrist.infinitesoulutions.com/

In my opinion you are way off base because
you fail to come to grips with her pesher methodology.
In my opinion it is a challenge for most to understand.

So? It's a 'challenge' no one here has shown the slightest interest in
taking up. Why do you insist on bringing it up ad fucking nauseum? Do
you honestly expect this time, or the next, or the next, or the next,
or the next, or the next, or the next, or the next to receive a
different reception?

If you do, there is a word for that.

.

Quantcast