Re: Nikon 10x42 SE (superior E)
From: John Traynor (jtraynorremovethispart_at_jtraynor.com)
Date: 06/02/04
- Next message: Tom McDonald: "Re: What lies beyond the Universe?"
- Previous message: Craig MacDougal: "Jupiter observations - 2 recent, 1 not so recent"
- In reply to: Blue Sea: "Re: Nikon 10x42 SE (superior E)"
- Next in thread: Alan French: "Re: Nikon 10x42 SE (superior E)"
- Reply: Alan French: "Re: Nikon 10x42 SE (superior E)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 22:40:45 -0400
"Blue Sea" <bluefins2005@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:61a8bd38.0406011811.956dcca@posting.google.com...
> Dan Daniel <ddandan.remove@pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:<ockdb0daoco4r546trglj88men4qsfvm9u@4ax.com>...
> > On 26 May 2004 16:33:56 -0700, bluefins2005@yahoo.com (Blue Sea)
> > wrote:
> >
> > >Dan Daniel <ddandan.remove@pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:<ja48b0lr9srd3qvgmigqdghl06v2gmqoor@4ax.com>...
> > >> On 25 May 2004 17:25:17 -0700, bluefins2005@yahoo.com (Blue Sea)
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> >IS this bino is relative waterproof if I use it in raining or very
> > >> >foggy environment? I just bought a used pair and wonder if I need to
> > >> >buy a new one to take advantage of 25 yrs warranty. Can owner of
Nikon
> > >> >SE give advise on this bino?
> > >> >
> > >> >Thx
> > >>
> > >> I've had no problems in rain and fog.
> > >>
> > >> Excellent binocular. I try others and keep coming back to them when I
> > >> want the best view.
> > >
> > >What are others, high end binos?
> >
> > I've owned Bruntons, Pentax, and Zeiss. Looked through Swifts,
> > Swarovski, those nikon roofs- Venturers?- and Leica.
> >
> > Of course, maybe I always find the SEs the best because I can't
> > justify paying $1200? :) The chromatic aberration is always greener
> > through the other guy's binoculars....
>
> I can only observed CA in one condition, look at california licence
> place
> with RED logo against while background and dark blue id at 15ft
> distance.
> Otherwise, I can't really detect CA in any other situations. Nikon
> site said CA is impossible to eliminate completely, which I don't
> beleive.
CA is present in $1500 binoculars. That should tell you something about the
difficulty in eliminating completely.
In any case, stop looking for it or you might become sensitized to it.
- Next message: Tom McDonald: "Re: What lies beyond the Universe?"
- Previous message: Craig MacDougal: "Jupiter observations - 2 recent, 1 not so recent"
- In reply to: Blue Sea: "Re: Nikon 10x42 SE (superior E)"
- Next in thread: Alan French: "Re: Nikon 10x42 SE (superior E)"
- Reply: Alan French: "Re: Nikon 10x42 SE (superior E)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
