Re: Single or multi hole off-axis filters?
From: Jon Isaacs (jonisaacs_at_aol.com)
Date: 06/10/04
- Next message: tholen_at_antispam.ham: "Re: Simultaneous transits of Venus and Mercury?"
- Previous message: Bruce Sidell: "Re: Non-Photos of the Transit of Venus"
- In reply to: Chris L Peterson: "Re: Single or multi hole off-axis filters?"
- Next in thread: Chris L Peterson: "Re: Single or multi hole off-axis filters?"
- Reply: Chris L Peterson: "Re: Single or multi hole off-axis filters?"
- Reply: Martin Brown: "Re: Single or multi hole off-axis filters?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 10 Jun 2004 01:01:39 GMT
>If you make a mask with a collection of randomly located holes, you will see
>that same pattern reflected in the multiple star images when out of focus.
When
>in focus, you will see a single star image. But note that at high
magnification, you will see a distinctly non-circular diffraction pattern
around this single >star image.
Thanks Chris and Brian for explaining this too me. This explanation is
something I can grab ahold of, it makes intuitive sense to me.
So, what do you guys think about using a 4 hole mask to get rid of the
Newtonian diffraction spikes while retaining as much mirror surface and
resolution as possible?
jon
- Next message: tholen_at_antispam.ham: "Re: Simultaneous transits of Venus and Mercury?"
- Previous message: Bruce Sidell: "Re: Non-Photos of the Transit of Venus"
- In reply to: Chris L Peterson: "Re: Single or multi hole off-axis filters?"
- Next in thread: Chris L Peterson: "Re: Single or multi hole off-axis filters?"
- Reply: Chris L Peterson: "Re: Single or multi hole off-axis filters?"
- Reply: Martin Brown: "Re: Single or multi hole off-axis filters?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]