Re: RETRACTION - DAVE BARRETT & HIGH POINT SCIENTIFIC

From: Rob Hunt (turtlepig_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 06/18/04 

Date: 18 Jun 2004 08:41:14 -0700

Hi Jon -

Bite off a piece of my dork why don't you?

Let anybody who wants to sue me for libel go right ahead. If you
think MY transgression was bigger than the outright theft of 9 grand
then you're simply off your frigging rocker.

You can take your high moral tone and cram it in your bum!

Rob Hunt

> Some things to consider:
>
> 1. You made a very serious mistake by mistakenly naming someone and falsely
> accusing them of fraud. Were that someone vindictive, that $9000 you are
> trying to recover could be peanuts compared to the amount it would cost you to
> defend yourself against a lawsuit.
>
> 2. You have repeated the same pattern of using the internet to accuse someone
> of fraud. You might be right or you might be wrong but this is not a forum to
> resolve such issues. After your first blunder I have no way of knowing if this
> Mr. Dave in Philly exists or not and personally I don't care.
>
> 3. While it was nice to apologize, there is a lesson here that, given the
> magnitude of your blunder (and it was big to say the least), should be
> immediately obvious to you and hopefully should keep you from every making such
> a post again.
>
> But that does not seem to be the case.
>
> Bottomline:
>
> A retraction and apology should contain no excuses, no justification for your
> error, it should only focus on the mistake that you make, your attempts to
> rectify it and a sincere effort to never make that same mistake again.
>
> Jon Isaacs

Relevant Pages

  • Re: RETRACTION - DAVE BARRETT & HIGH POINT SCIENTIFIC
    ... You made a very serious mistake by mistakenly naming someone and falsely ... accusing them of fraud. ... After your first blunder I have no way of knowing if this ... While it was nice to apologize, there is a lesson here that, given the ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: 12 LED resistance circuit help
    ... >> no reason for me to apologize to you for flaming you about that. ... >cussing me out after I pointed out your mistake. ... >>>The simple fact remains that one LED WILL DISIPATE MORE POWER THAN ... of two LEDs in series, one with Vfmin and the other with Vfmax with ...
    (sci.electronics.basics)
  • Re: 12 LED resistance circuit help
    ... I made the mistake of figuring that you actually posted stuff that you ... >>> no reason for me to apologize to you for flaming you about that. ... > of two LEDs in series, one with Vfmin and the other with Vfmax with ... >>> question since, trick question or not, it certainly woke you up ...
    (sci.electronics.basics)
  • Re: JSH: Groupthink
    ... >> And he has been saying this for OVER A YEAR. ... What was deleted was the main text of APF. ... >> You would think by now he might have noticed this mistake. ... >> Now he accuses US of fraud for pointing out such things. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION _- FOR YOUR INFORMATION ONLY
    ... Subject: trashing bodhi ... > and you never apologized for that mistake either. ... Why should i apologize when i didn't send you any threating e-mails?? ...
    (alt.gathering.rainbow)
Quantcast