Re: RETRACTION - DAVE BARRETT & HIGH POINT SCIENTIFIC
From: Paul Lawler (stargazer_at_kilolaniDOT.net)
Date: 06/19/04
- Next message: Paul Lawler: "Re: Kerry on Bush Space Plan: At least he's in favor of Saving Hubble!"
- Previous message: John Schilling: "Re: MOST (was Re: Zodiacal light linked to ancient Martian oceans)"
- In reply to: Mike Ruskai: "Re: RETRACTION - DAVE BARRETT & HIGH POINT SCIENTIFIC"
- Next in thread: Jan Owen: "Re: RETRACTION - DAVE BARRETT & HIGH POINT SCIENTIFIC"
- Reply: Jan Owen: "Re: RETRACTION - DAVE BARRETT & HIGH POINT SCIENTIFIC"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2004 04:10:39 GMT
"Mike Ruskai" <spamten.knilhtrae@begonedynnaht.net> wrote in message
news:gunaalqrneguyvaxarg.hzjby14.pminews@news.east.earthlink.net...
> On 18 Jun 2004 13:03:14 GMT, Rod Mollise wrote:
>
> >I hope you realize the enormity of what
>
> Sorry to nitpick (well, not really), but every now and then, this one bugs
> me so much I have to comment.
>
> Enormity means depraved abnormality. It is not a synonym for
> enormousness, despite their (obvious) common etymological roots.
Dunno... my dictionary says:
1. The quality of passing all moral bounds; excessive wickedness or
outrageousness.
2. A monstrous offense or evil; an outrage.
I would posit that even though engaging in a bit of hyperbole, Rod was using
definition 2.
- Next message: Paul Lawler: "Re: Kerry on Bush Space Plan: At least he's in favor of Saving Hubble!"
- Previous message: John Schilling: "Re: MOST (was Re: Zodiacal light linked to ancient Martian oceans)"
- In reply to: Mike Ruskai: "Re: RETRACTION - DAVE BARRETT & HIGH POINT SCIENTIFIC"
- Next in thread: Jan Owen: "Re: RETRACTION - DAVE BARRETT & HIGH POINT SCIENTIFIC"
- Reply: Jan Owen: "Re: RETRACTION - DAVE BARRETT & HIGH POINT SCIENTIFIC"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]