Re: Cloudy Nights vs. Astromart Articles
From: Bettrel (bettrel_at_aol.com)
Date: 06/19/04
- Next message: andrea tasselli: "Re: A REALLY NEAT CLOSE-UP OF COMET NEAT FROM KITT PEAK OBSERVATORY (STScI-NN040617)"
- Previous message: Jeff Schroeder: "Stars turned off in SoCal"
- In reply to: David Knisely: "Re: Cloudy Nights vs. Astromart Articles"
- Next in thread: Chuck: "Re: Cloudy Nights vs. Astromart Articles"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 19 Jun 2004 06:19:41 GMT
>> let's face it, given the percentage of new reviews that are deemed
>> CN reports, in time, the majority of information on Cloudy Nights will
>_not_ be
>> free.
>
> From this, it sounds like you haven't really looked at the site all that
>carefully. In the past two months, there have been a total of 43 *new*
>articles appearing on Cloudynights (since April 20th, 2004). Of those most
>recent articles, only 10 have been in the CN Reports section.
Ah... I was a bit too quick... I'll grant I did say "information" rather than
"reviews", though having said "reviews" earlier in the sentence it might be
assumed that's what I meant... and, indeed, it is. Sorry.
Tonya
- Next message: andrea tasselli: "Re: A REALLY NEAT CLOSE-UP OF COMET NEAT FROM KITT PEAK OBSERVATORY (STScI-NN040617)"
- Previous message: Jeff Schroeder: "Stars turned off in SoCal"
- In reply to: David Knisely: "Re: Cloudy Nights vs. Astromart Articles"
- Next in thread: Chuck: "Re: Cloudy Nights vs. Astromart Articles"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
