Re: RETRACTION - DAVE BARRETT & HIGH POINT SCIENTIFIC
From: Rod Mollise (rmollise_at_aol.com)
Date: 06/19/04
- Next message: Rod Mollise: "Re: Mirror lock-up"
- Previous message: Rod Mollise: "Re: RETRACTION - DAVE BARRETT & HIGH POINT SCIENTIFIC"
- In reply to: Jan Owen: "Re: RETRACTION - DAVE BARRETT & HIGH POINT SCIENTIFIC"
- Next in thread: Rod Mollise: "Re: RETRACTION - DAVE BARRETT & HIGH POINT SCIENTIFIC"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 19 Jun 2004 13:59:46 GMT
>
>I think Rod was right on the money...
>
BTW, guys, depending on the source you use, the "immense/huge" definition of
the word may not be first. Meriam Webster, which I just looked at, places it
third behind "depraved," etc. The Webster I checked first was the one in the
single volume with Roget's. Maybe _Irving_ Webster. ;-)
Peace,
Rod Mollise
Author of _Choosing and Using a Schmidt Cassegrain Telescope_
Like SCTs and MCTs?
Check-out sct-user, the mailing list for CAT fanciers!
Goto <http://members.aol.com/RMOLLISE/index.html>
- Next message: Rod Mollise: "Re: Mirror lock-up"
- Previous message: Rod Mollise: "Re: RETRACTION - DAVE BARRETT & HIGH POINT SCIENTIFIC"
- In reply to: Jan Owen: "Re: RETRACTION - DAVE BARRETT & HIGH POINT SCIENTIFIC"
- Next in thread: Rod Mollise: "Re: RETRACTION - DAVE BARRETT & HIGH POINT SCIENTIFIC"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]