Re: RETRACTION - DAVE BARRETT & HIGH POINT SCIENTIFIC
From: Rod Mollise (rmollise_at_aol.com)
Date: 06/19/04
- Next message: Paul Lawler: "Re: How Much of the Space Pgm Deserves Support?"
- Previous message: Paul Lawler: "Re: RETRACTION - DAVE BARRETT & HIGH POINT SCIENTIFIC"
- In reply to: Mike Ruskai: "Re: RETRACTION - DAVE BARRETT & HIGH POINT SCIENTIFIC"
- Next in thread: Paul Lawler: "Re: RETRACTION - DAVE BARRETT & HIGH POINT SCIENTIFIC"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 19 Jun 2004 21:17:49 GMT
>
>Check this out for a small discussion about the recent incorrect usage of
>enormity (though I agree that you're particular usage here easily
>qualifies for the standard definition <g>):
Hi Mike;
I have my pet peeves too...but...just keep telling yourself that English is a
living language. Its incredible strength is the way it "steals" words from
other languages and mutates the spellings and usages of the words it already
has. It may be infuriating, but it's a good thing. ;-)
Peace,
Rod Mollise
Author of _Choosing and Using a Schmidt Cassegrain Telescope_
Like SCTs and MCTs?
Check-out sct-user, the mailing list for CAT fanciers!
Goto <http://members.aol.com/RMOLLISE/index.html>
- Next message: Paul Lawler: "Re: How Much of the Space Pgm Deserves Support?"
- Previous message: Paul Lawler: "Re: RETRACTION - DAVE BARRETT & HIGH POINT SCIENTIFIC"
- In reply to: Mike Ruskai: "Re: RETRACTION - DAVE BARRETT & HIGH POINT SCIENTIFIC"
- Next in thread: Paul Lawler: "Re: RETRACTION - DAVE BARRETT & HIGH POINT SCIENTIFIC"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|