Re: vacuum of space
From: Mike Thomas (Mtom_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 06/29/04
- Next message: Chris L Peterson: "Re: Naked eye star splitting"
- Previous message: Jon Isaacs: "Re: 2" 90° Apparent Field Eyepieces Announced"
- In reply to: Sam Wormley: "Re: vacuum of space"
- Next in thread: Chris L Peterson: "Re: vacuum of space"
- Reply: Chris L Peterson: "Re: vacuum of space"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:59:49 GMT
"> BTW there is no "vacuum pressure"... atmospheric pressure comes from
the
> weight of the atmosphere, caused by the Earth's gravity.
>
> Escape Velocity
> http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/EscapeVelocity.html
>
> Atmospheric Pressure
> http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/AtmosphericPressure.html
>
> Pressure
> http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/Pressure.html
I use it as a relative term as in Gradient. There is a potential High to
Low pressure gradient.
The idea is that the vacuum does not have the differential force to
accelerate gas atoms
to escape velocity. That's what you should have said or something like it.
- Next message: Chris L Peterson: "Re: Naked eye star splitting"
- Previous message: Jon Isaacs: "Re: 2" 90° Apparent Field Eyepieces Announced"
- In reply to: Sam Wormley: "Re: vacuum of space"
- Next in thread: Chris L Peterson: "Re: vacuum of space"
- Reply: Chris L Peterson: "Re: vacuum of space"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|