Re: Naked eye star splitting
From: Chris L Peterson (clp_at_alumni.caltech.edu)
Date: 06/29/04
- Next message: Chris L Peterson: "Re: Naked eye star splitting"
- Previous message: lal_truckee: "Re: High attrition rate"
- In reply to: Brian Tung: "Re: Naked eye star splitting"
- Next in thread: Martin Brown: "Re: Naked eye star splitting"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 22:43:08 GMT
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 21:18:45 +0000 (UTC), brian@isi.edu (Brian Tung) wrote:
>> At about 1/4 the separation of Alcor and Mizar, eta Lyra is a much better
>> test of acuity- I do see a relationship between age and ease of splitting
>> it.
>
>I'm going to assume you again mean epsilon Lyra(e). :)
Not exactly, but damn, that time I forgot the <g>.
_________________________________________________
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
http://www.cloudbait.com
- Next message: Chris L Peterson: "Re: Naked eye star splitting"
- Previous message: lal_truckee: "Re: High attrition rate"
- In reply to: Brian Tung: "Re: Naked eye star splitting"
- Next in thread: Martin Brown: "Re: Naked eye star splitting"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
