Re: vacuum of space
From: Wfoley2 (wfoley2_at_wmconnect.comcast.net)
Date: 06/29/04
- Next message: Jon Isaacs: "Re: budget wide field eyepeices???"
- Previous message: Tom Hole: "Re: High attrition rate"
- In reply to: Norbert: "Re: vacuum of space"
- Next in thread: Sam Wormley: "Re: vacuum of space"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 29 Jun 2004 23:28:22 GMT
>Gravity, may be ?
Is that the gravity from mass of the Earth, or the gravity which the replusion
of space causes? Oh, just a minute, can the repulsion of space prevent it from
being less a vacuum?? Let's see - I think that the force of gravity seems to
be more produced by the size and density of a body than the (expanding) volume
of space. So maybe the "Gravity of Repulsion" quack needs to figure out a plan
"B".
<g>
Clear, Dark, Steady Skies!
(And considerate neighbors!!!)
- Next message: Jon Isaacs: "Re: budget wide field eyepeices???"
- Previous message: Tom Hole: "Re: High attrition rate"
- In reply to: Norbert: "Re: vacuum of space"
- Next in thread: Sam Wormley: "Re: vacuum of space"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|