Re: Binoculars ---> Telescope
From: Ioannis (morpheus_at_olympus.mons)
Date: 06/30/04
- Next message: Steve Taylor: "Re: Tension Springs"
- Previous message: Jon Isaacs: "Re: Naked-Eye Visual Magnitude Limit"
- In reply to: Jon Isaacs: "Re: Binoculars ---> Telescope"
- Next in thread: Jon Isaacs: "Re: Binoculars ---> Telescope"
- Reply: Jon Isaacs: "Re: Binoculars ---> Telescope"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 20:44:59 +0300
Jon Isaacs wrote:
[snip]
> I am not disputing that, I notice the "3D" effect myself.
>
> I was just pointing out that the separation of the objectives makes no
> difference in that "3D" effect at astronomical distances.
Well, the distance to the objects can be taken "for all practical
purposes" to be infinity, so the object's parallax for the two images
between the two eyes (even slightly enhanced by the bino distance) would
be very close to 0, so I agree on this.
I am still wondering why do I get the distinct 3D sensation and what
causes it. Perhaps sphericity of field in low quality achromats?
[snip]
>
> jon
-- I. N. Galidakis http://users.forthnet.gr/ath/jgal/ ------------------------------------------ Eventually, _everything_ is understandable
- Next message: Steve Taylor: "Re: Tension Springs"
- Previous message: Jon Isaacs: "Re: Naked-Eye Visual Magnitude Limit"
- In reply to: Jon Isaacs: "Re: Binoculars ---> Telescope"
- Next in thread: Jon Isaacs: "Re: Binoculars ---> Telescope"
- Reply: Jon Isaacs: "Re: Binoculars ---> Telescope"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|