Re: Titan's paradox
From: Anthony Garcia (axgarciaz65_at_go.com)
Date: 07/01/04
- Next message: Ioannis: "Mounting ideas for binos and scope"
- Previous message: John Carruthers: "Re: Surprise tonight"
- In reply to: Jim Hewitt: "Re: Titan's paradox"
- Next in thread: Jim Hewitt: "Re: Titan's paradox"
- Reply: Jim Hewitt: "Re: Titan's paradox"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 17:44:21 GMT
"Jim Hewitt" <jim_hewitt@spam begone.hp.com> wrote in message
news:34YEc.5184$B_2.4505@news.cpqcorp.net...
[snip]
> But I don't understand your reference to Titan's atmosphere - it's not
like
> the Martian atmosphere killed the failed Martian probes. _Unless_ you
> consider burning up in the atmosphere due to incorrect trajectory caused
by
> other failures, which could still happen to Huygens, for example, if
it's
> parachutes fail to deploy.
>
> So I fail to see your point. Do you want to rephrase you statement?
>
> Jim
[snip]
If I may interject ...
It is arguable that Beagle 2 may have died and Spirit nearly did so
because the atmosphere was not sufficiently characterized so that the
landers would not impact at too high of a velocity.
- Anthony
- Next message: Ioannis: "Mounting ideas for binos and scope"
- Previous message: John Carruthers: "Re: Surprise tonight"
- In reply to: Jim Hewitt: "Re: Titan's paradox"
- Next in thread: Jim Hewitt: "Re: Titan's paradox"
- Reply: Jim Hewitt: "Re: Titan's paradox"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|