Re: Are rings of Saturn evidence of a young solar system/universe?
From: Davoud (star_at_sky.net)
Date: 07/04/04
- Next message: starlord: "Re: Cassini: its cost and purpose?"
- Previous message: Jon Kickerston: "Re: Cassini: its cost and purpose?"
- In reply to: David Buckna: "Are rings of Saturn evidence of a young solar system/universe?"
- Next in thread: Zane: "Re: Are rings of Saturn evidence of a young solar system/universe?"
- Reply:(deleted message) Zane: "Re: Are rings of Saturn evidence of a young solar system/universe?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2004 13:41:53 -0400
David Buckna:
> Creationists say that the rings of Saturn are just one of several
> evidences indicating the universe is young..
*****
Wrong newsgroup. This is a "sci" newsgroup, "sci" as in "science," the
search for truth. Not many regulars here give a flying f**k what
idealogues say. To say that there are "evidences" that the Universe is
young (unless you call 13.5 billion years "young") is a lie, and such a
lie is ipso facto antithetic to the purpose of a "sci" newsgroup.
Davoud
-- usenet *at* davidillig dawt com
- Next message: starlord: "Re: Cassini: its cost and purpose?"
- Previous message: Jon Kickerston: "Re: Cassini: its cost and purpose?"
- In reply to: David Buckna: "Are rings of Saturn evidence of a young solar system/universe?"
- Next in thread: Zane: "Re: Are rings of Saturn evidence of a young solar system/universe?"
- Reply:(deleted message) Zane: "Re: Are rings of Saturn evidence of a young solar system/universe?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|