Re: Are rings of Saturn evidence of a young solar system/universe?
From: Howie Glatter (howieglatter_at_mindspring.com)
Date: 07/04/04
- Next message: Chris L Peterson: "Re: Are rings of Saturn evidence of a young solar system/universe?"
- Previous message: Michael Ash: "Re: Fermi paradox, your own belief?"
- In reply to: David Buckna: "Are rings of Saturn evidence of a young solar system/universe?"
- Next in thread: Chris L Peterson: "Re: Are rings of Saturn evidence of a young solar system/universe?"
- Reply: Chris L Peterson: "Re: Are rings of Saturn evidence of a young solar system/universe?"
- Reply: Dave: "Re: Are rings of Saturn evidence of a young solar system/universe?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 4 Jul 2004 16:16:07 -0700
David Buckna wrote ...
>. . .An authoritative
> book on Saturn made this point about Saturn's moon Iapetus: "At
> estimated current rates it would require one thousand billion years to
> produce the crater density observed on Iapetus."
Is that close to a trillion ?
Famous T.V.commercial from the past: "Anacin contains
1000 milligrams of pain reliever . ."
H.
- Next message: Chris L Peterson: "Re: Are rings of Saturn evidence of a young solar system/universe?"
- Previous message: Michael Ash: "Re: Fermi paradox, your own belief?"
- In reply to: David Buckna: "Are rings of Saturn evidence of a young solar system/universe?"
- Next in thread: Chris L Peterson: "Re: Are rings of Saturn evidence of a young solar system/universe?"
- Reply: Chris L Peterson: "Re: Are rings of Saturn evidence of a young solar system/universe?"
- Reply: Dave: "Re: Are rings of Saturn evidence of a young solar system/universe?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]