Re: Fully formed 8-11 billion year old galaxies observed.
From: starman (starman_at_tech.net)
Date: 07/08/04
- Next message: Rod Mollise: "Re: Apple Astronomy Software"
- Previous message: Mike Ruskai: "Re: Definitive moon size illusion experiment"
- In reply to: Brian Tung: "Re: Fully formed 8-11 billion year old galaxies observed."
- Next in thread: Brian Tung: "Re: Fully formed 8-11 billion year old galaxies observed."
- Reply: Brian Tung: "Re: Fully formed 8-11 billion year old galaxies observed."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2004 18:19:53 -0400
Brian Tung wrote:
>
> Jon Kickerston wrote:
> > Nearly 32 billion l.y.? Wow! I guess that challenges the current age of
> > the universe a bit.
>
> No, it doesn't, actually--check the last paragraph of Sam's cite, which
> I retained. The expansion of the universe, as measured by the speed at
> which two particular objects are separating from one another, is not
> limited by the speed of light. The universe therefore does not have to
> be 32 billion years old in order for two objects to be 32 billion
> light-years apart.
True but at what phase of the universe's evolution was it effectively
expanding faster than the speed of light?
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
- Next message: Rod Mollise: "Re: Apple Astronomy Software"
- Previous message: Mike Ruskai: "Re: Definitive moon size illusion experiment"
- In reply to: Brian Tung: "Re: Fully formed 8-11 billion year old galaxies observed."
- Next in thread: Brian Tung: "Re: Fully formed 8-11 billion year old galaxies observed."
- Reply: Brian Tung: "Re: Fully formed 8-11 billion year old galaxies observed."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|