Re: SCT Primary Mirror and Wavefront Aberrations
From: matt (mariusrf_at_bellsouth.net)
Date: 07/09/04
- Next message: Rod Mollise: "Re: initial spherical aberration tests completed"
- Previous message: Jon Isaacs: "Re: Apple Astronomy Software"
- In reply to: William Hamblen: "Re: SCT Primary Mirror and Wavefront Aberrations"
- Next in thread: Chris1011: "Re: SCT Primary Mirror and Wavefront Aberrations"
- Reply: Chris1011: "Re: SCT Primary Mirror and Wavefront Aberrations"
- Reply: Vladimir Sacek: "Re: SCT Primary Mirror and Wavefront Aberrations"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2004 09:53:56 -0400
William Hamblen wrote in message ...
>On 2004-07-08, matt <mariusrf@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
>> I'm having a hard time locating any reference dealing with analysis of
>> wavefront aberrations in SCT type scopes. More specifically, how are the
>> primary mirror and corrector wavefront errors contributing to the scope
>> overall aberrations, taking into account the x5 magnifying secondary ?
>
>Telescope Optics by Rutten and van Venrooij, Willmann-Bell 1988, has a
>chapter on SCTs. Correction for the spherical aberration of the spherical
>primary is done by the corrector plate _and_ the secondary mirror.
>
you are correct, it has such a chapter .
The problem with that is that there is no analytical expression derived for
overall SCT aberrations due to primary mirror aberrations or better said
defects (aberrations could exist due to design, defects are differences from
designed shape) . I don't see how the corrector plate could in any way
influence the primary mirror wavefront errors other than SA . My original
question, regarding overall errors, was referring to the OTHER
manufacturing errors , not to SA which in theory is compensated for by the
corrector and aspheric secondary . Say the primary is not that spheric , due
to its manufacturing , deviating from spheric by x . Say the primary also
has a certain amount of peaks and valleys with a certain RMS or P-V value .
How does the scope overall aberrations change , in a quantitative way , that
was the sense of my question .
Short of modelling the scope in Oslo, for which I need some more reading, I
couldn't find any written reference to this question .
thanks,
matt tudor
- Next message: Rod Mollise: "Re: initial spherical aberration tests completed"
- Previous message: Jon Isaacs: "Re: Apple Astronomy Software"
- In reply to: William Hamblen: "Re: SCT Primary Mirror and Wavefront Aberrations"
- Next in thread: Chris1011: "Re: SCT Primary Mirror and Wavefront Aberrations"
- Reply: Chris1011: "Re: SCT Primary Mirror and Wavefront Aberrations"
- Reply: Vladimir Sacek: "Re: SCT Primary Mirror and Wavefront Aberrations"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|