Re: Celestron C9.25

From: Reef1969 (reef1969_at_aol.com)
Date: 07/11/04 

Date: 11 Jul 2004 21:46:05 GMT

Mass produced scopes will likely vary sample to sample. I don't think you can
make an accurate blanket statement that the 9.25 SCT is the best. I have owned
two 9.25's, and both were good samples. I am sure there are bad samples out
there. No matter what people tell you the mirrors for the 9.25 are not figured
with magical dust. That being said they make an excellent all purpose scope.

Clear Skies
Richard

Relevant Pages

  • Re: ETX-105 vs 8" Dob
    ... Setup is quick, alignment is only necessary if something ... just create another one between itself and the SCT... ... > action prior to buying one is the best way IMHO to make a wise first ... > a variety of scopes but to talk to the owners and find out about ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: C11 quality: now compared with 5 years ago?
    ... serve market desires. ... And a bunch of less than high quality scopes ... by 1989 ro 1990 the SCT manufactures ... prevents either from producing less than "pretty good" scopes. ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: Best Webcamera for Astroimaging currently?
    ... NexImage at daytime using any SCT or refractor? ... So people who would buy the Celestron NextImage can only ... What scopes for example since ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: RCX400 and LX200R
    ... using an OGS 20-inch RC since 1994. ... friend's Celestron 9.25 SCT. ... Mars compared to all these scopes, ... first Obsession 20 I saw on Astromart and I've been very happy with it. ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: Meade RCX400 is NOT Ritchey-Chretien.
    ... > Nothing common between Meade RCX and true Ritchey-Chretien. ... > For CCD photography these new scopes will be not better, ... > traditional SCT with focal reducer-comacorrector. ... > smooth optics) and larger central obstruction. ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
Quantcast