Re: Bush goes Nuclear!

From: Double-A (double-a_at_hush.com)
Date: 07/25/04 

Date: 25 Jul 2004 06:55:26 -0700

"Tom Potter" <tdp@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:<2mh10lFmqubbU9@uni-berlin.de>...
> "Double-A" <double-a@hush.com> wrote in message
> news:79094630.0407231659.194453d7@posting.google.com...
> > "Tom Potter" <tdp@earthlink.net> wrote in message
> news:<2mcqkuFlp3k4U12@uni-berlin.de>...
> > > "Richard Herring" <junk@[127.0.0.1]> wrote in message
> > > news:7bTW6spoF+$AFwEQ@baesystems.com...
> > > > In message <2ma0ajFkgn2dU1@uni-berlin.de>, Tom Potter
> > > > <tdp@earthlink.net> writes
> > > > >-"Richard Herring" <junk@[127.0.0.1]> wrote in message
> > > > >
> > > > >"Tom Potter" <tdp@earthlink.net> wrote in message
> > > > >news:2m7icvFd7ushU12@uni-berlin.de...
> > > > >>
> > > > >> "Richard Herring" <junk@[127.0.0.1]> wrote in message
> > > > >> news:PBW7sN1$5T$AFwTu@baesystems.com...
> > > > >> > In message <2m4rgqFi6ib4U2@uni-berlin.de>, Tom Potter
> > > > >> > <tdp@earthlink.net> writes
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >"Richard Herring" <junk@[127.0.0.1]> wrote in message
> > > > >> > >news:CiJIU+AAoN$AFwQo@baesystems.com...
> > > > >> > >> In message <2m29h3Fhqqi4U8@uni-berlin.de>, Tom Potter
> > > > >> > >> <tdp@earthlink.net> writes
> > > > >> > >> >
> > > > >> > >> >"Richard Herring" <junk@[127.0.0.1]> wrote in message
> > > > >> > >> >news:X2eNhPEax4+AFwrn@baesystems.com...
> > > > >> > >> >> In message <2lt0pnFgf3viU2@uni-berlin.de>, Tom Potter
> > > > >> > >> >> <tdp@earthlink.net> writes
>
> > > > >> > >> >> >What do you recommend?
> > > > >> > >> >> >
> > > > >> > >> >> You could start by correcting all the errors in your
> "tutorial".
> > > > >> > >> >
> > > > >> > >> >I'll be more than happy to correct any errors
> > > > >> > >> >that you can point out, and prove are errors.
> > > > >> > >> >
> > > > >> > >> I already have. You acknowledged the error, then failed to
> make
> the
> > > > >> > >> correction.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >As I recall, "Richard Herring" found NO specific errors in the
> tutorial.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Then your recollection is incorrect.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> It may well be that your "recollection is incorrect."
> > > >
> > > > [unacknowledged snip restored]
> > > > >>>Did you buy those scare quotes by the bushel?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> If you think you are "correct"
> > > > >> post your old post, and let's see what it said.
> > > > >
> > > > >- http://tinyurl.com/3wqob
> > > > >-
> > > > >-Note the subject line. Read the rest of the thread.
> > > > >-
> > > > >Don't play games, equivocate, or run and hide,
> > > >
> > > > ROFL. PKB.
> > > >
> > > > >just repost your old post,
> > > > >and let's see what it said.
> > > >
> > > > http://tinyurl.com/3wqob is a link to my old post, in context, and
> your
> > > > lying response to it.
> > > >
> > > > Are you unable to follow the link to it?
> > > >
> > > > >Are you afraid to debate the content of your post?
> > > >
> > > > I don't think you understand. I'm simply not _interested_ in
> "debating"
> > > > anything with you, if that's what you call your puerile word games.
> > > > You're not just a troll but a boring troll.
> > > >
> > > > You asked for evidence; I have presented evidence. End of story.
> > >
> > > All I have seen is your assertion that you "presented evidence".
> > >
> > > If you cannot post your evidence,
> > > and be prepared to defend your assertion,
> > > I can only assume that you are a liar,
> > > and have no "evidence", or else,
> > > you are not too confident in the evidence
> > > you claim to have.
> >
> > I did read the evidence posted by Herring.
> >
> > It was wondrous to see you, Potter, admitting that his definition was
> > better than yours.
>
> If
> "It was wondrous to see <me>
> admitting that his definition was better than <mine>"
>
> why don't you post the actual exchange,
> so that other folks can experience this "wondrous" thing?
>
> That way, rational, intelligent folks can determine
> for themselves what the facts are.

Because the rational, intelligent folks know how to go look at the
reference directly in its original context, just as I did.

Double-A

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Bush goes Nuclear!
    ... >> I did read the evidence posted by Herring. ... >> It was wondrous to see you, Potter, admitting that his definition was ... intelligent folks know how to go look at the ... reference directly in its original context, ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Bush goes Nuclear!
    ... >> I did read the evidence posted by Herring. ... >> It was wondrous to see you, Potter, admitting that his definition was ... intelligent folks know how to go look at the ... reference directly in its original context, ...
    (sci.astro)
  • Re: Bush goes Nuclear!
    ... >> I did read the evidence posted by Herring. ... >> It was wondrous to see you, Potter, admitting that his definition was ... intelligent folks know how to go look at the ... reference directly in its original context, ...
    (sci.archaeology)
Quantcast