Re: Super-Nova
From: Davoud (star_at_sky.net)
Date: 08/03/04
- Next message: Mick: "Re: moonrise and time offset"
- Previous message: Xavier: "California starparty?"
- In reply to: Sam Wormley: "Re: Super-Nova"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2004 08:50:37 -0400
I _think_ that Sam Wormley meant to write:
> I think of an exploding/imploding star (supernova) [as] more
> of a finish than a start.
I take the opposite view. Without supernovae and the heavy elements
that they produce we would not be here to discuss why massive stars
collapse and then explode. This, if I understand it at all, is akin to
the anthropic principle -- supernovae exist to give rise to beings who
can discuss supernovae.
Davoud
-- usenet *at* davidillig dawt com
- Next message: Mick: "Re: moonrise and time offset"
- Previous message: Xavier: "California starparty?"
- In reply to: Sam Wormley: "Re: Super-Nova"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]