Long exposure vs. multiple exposure
From: Steve Maddison (steve_at_cosam.org)
Date: 08/19/04
- Next message: MikeThomas: "Re: Users of CG5 mount"
- Previous message: Uncle Al: "Re: *** HILAL (Crescent Moon) SIGHTING 16/17 Mon/Tue AUG 2004, RAJAB1425 AH ***"
- Next in thread: Chris L Peterson: "Re: Long exposure vs. multiple exposure"
- Reply: Chris L Peterson: "Re: Long exposure vs. multiple exposure"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 02:11:26 +0200
Hi all,
I bought a Canon PowerShot S45 digital camera a year or two ago before I
got into astronomy. It's a decent camera, I was thinking of rigging it
up to try my hand at astrophotography.
I've looked through the docs and experimented with long exposures, but
this model only goes up to a maximum of 15 seconds. I was initially a
little disappointed, but then got thinking about using multiple
exposures of 15 seconds (or less) and stacking the images.
Maybe my logic has taken a wrong turn somewhere but, given the accuracy
of your average, run-of-the-mill mount, wouldn't the use of several
images allow some manual correction of tracking errors? Surely there is
some major advantage of a single, longer exposure that I've so far
overlooked? (Apart from the obvious elimination of the stacking process
itself.)
Just wondering,
Steve
- Next message: MikeThomas: "Re: Users of CG5 mount"
- Previous message: Uncle Al: "Re: *** HILAL (Crescent Moon) SIGHTING 16/17 Mon/Tue AUG 2004, RAJAB1425 AH ***"
- Next in thread: Chris L Peterson: "Re: Long exposure vs. multiple exposure"
- Reply: Chris L Peterson: "Re: Long exposure vs. multiple exposure"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]