Re: How can globs be so old?
From: Drew (dwildstar30_at_nowhere.nospam.com)
Date: 08/19/04
- Next message: Chris L Peterson: "Re: Long exposure vs. multiple exposure"
- Previous message: Tony Flanders: "Re: Best $100 you've spent on the hobby?"
- In reply to: Drew: "How can globs be so old?"
- Next in thread: Canopus: "Re: How can globs be so old?"
- Reply: Canopus: "Re: How can globs be so old?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 01:08:48 GMT
Thanks all for your responses. I forgot that red giants used to be
typical main sequence stars...so since that is the case I guess
globular clusters will continue to dim and finally fade away as the
last remaining M dwarf members slowly fade out?
Makes me wonder how much more impressive they must have been billions
of years ago (not that they aren't impressive now).
-Drew
- Next message: Chris L Peterson: "Re: Long exposure vs. multiple exposure"
- Previous message: Tony Flanders: "Re: Best $100 you've spent on the hobby?"
- In reply to: Drew: "How can globs be so old?"
- Next in thread: Canopus: "Re: How can globs be so old?"
- Reply: Canopus: "Re: How can globs be so old?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]