Re: The first night out with my 10" dob.
From: Jan Owen (janowen1z_at_cox.net)
Date: 09/05/04
- Next message: Paul Hyndman: "One mo' AR667 (latest solar H-a image)"
- Previous message: sheep defender: "Re: Actual photons?"
- In reply to: Tom: "The first night out with my 10" dob."
- Next in thread: Tom: "Re: The first night out with my 10" dob."
- Reply: Tom: "Re: The first night out with my 10" dob."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2004 18:44:50 -0700
There is no eyepiece for your scope that will let you see all of M31. It
is WAY too large. Don't blame your eyepiece, or the scope. M31 is HUGE!
It will fill the field of a pair of BINOCULARS!
Right now, you need just to use the eyepieces you have on the objects you
want to see, and determine where the shortcomings are. THEN you can
decide what eyepieces you need next. But one eyepiece you aren't going to
find, is one that will show you all of M31 in your scope... But a 32mm
Plossl will still be pretty awesome...
-- Jan Owen To reach me directly, remove the Z, if one appears in my e-mail address... Latitude: 33.662 Longitude: -112.3272 "Tom" <tom@wallyworld.net> wrote in message news:10jkr9v594tln53@corp.supernews.com... > Actually, it was my first night out with a telescope, period. Location: > north Scottsdale. Suburban skies, and clear. The seeing conditions seemed > better > in the east for some reason, so I kept my observing in the back patio. This > dob, a Hardin, came with two eyepieces. The 2" is pretty nice, and I have > no complaints yet. The 1.25 9mm is pretty shoddy. There is some black > stuff > encroaching over the lens. I wonder if I can flick it off with a needle. > This > e.p. probably isn't worth shipping back for replacement. This dob has the > new > crayford focuser, which is supposed to be a good thing:-) > > I have dreamed of seeing M31. From what I have read, I knew enough to find > it. After searching and searching with the 2" in the area to the left of > the "Great Square", I finally noticed a smudge of light that was in stark > contrast to surrounding collection of stars in my field of view. I put the > 9mm in to get a closer look, and the smudge got a bit bigger, but by no > means did it give me a detailed view of a galaxy. > I strongly assume this is M31 anyways. How can I make the most of this? 7mm > Televue Plossl with a good 3x Barlow? The 9mm gave me a 140x mag. and this > doesn't seem optimal for M31. People say that M31 is visible with the naked > eye, which could suggest that light pollution in north Scottsdale is worse > than I think. I never did find it again later that night. > > Later that night (morning), I noticed an interesting cluster with my naked > eyes, and set my bino's on it. Pleiades! I had never seen that formation > magnified before. I stayed up the whole night to see Saturn and Venus, but > by 5 a.m. clouds had set in:-( I did get a brief break in the clouds to see > a bright object with the binos, dead east. It was disky, like a planet, and > very bright, but no rings. Venus I assume. > > -Tom > >
- Next message: Paul Hyndman: "One mo' AR667 (latest solar H-a image)"
- Previous message: sheep defender: "Re: Actual photons?"
- In reply to: Tom: "The first night out with my 10" dob."
- Next in thread: Tom: "Re: The first night out with my 10" dob."
- Reply: Tom: "Re: The first night out with my 10" dob."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
Loading