Re: Refractor vs. Reflector?
From: Steve Hix (sehix_at_NOSPAMspeakeasy.netINVALID)
Date: 09/05/04
- Next message: Tom: "Re: The first night out with my 10" dob."
- Previous message: Florian: "Re: Actual photons?"
- In reply to: Phil Wheeler: "Re: Refractor vs. Reflector?"
- Next in thread: Phil Wheeler: "Re: Refractor vs. Reflector?"
- Reply: Phil Wheeler: "Re: Refractor vs. Reflector?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2004 19:09:15 -0700
In article <4bt_c.17616$aB1.1561@twister.socal.rr.com>,
Phil Wheeler <w6tuh-ng4@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Wfoley2 wrote:
> > Refractors are OK if you have a lot of money to put into getting quality,
> > like
> > Takahashi, AP, and other very reputable brands. Bushnell is currently a
> > scope
> > of ill repute.
>
> Currently?
Meaning, since the end of the paleocene era.
- Next message: Tom: "Re: The first night out with my 10" dob."
- Previous message: Florian: "Re: Actual photons?"
- In reply to: Phil Wheeler: "Re: Refractor vs. Reflector?"
- Next in thread: Phil Wheeler: "Re: Refractor vs. Reflector?"
- Reply: Phil Wheeler: "Re: Refractor vs. Reflector?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|