Re: Frances a dud

From: John Beaderstadt (beadnot_at_pivot.nyet)
Date: 09/05/04


Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2004 07:57:53 -0400

While reading in the bathroom on Sat, 04 Sep 2004 21:30:54 GMT, I saw
that "CarboHolic" <carbs@hotrod.com> had written:

>http://www.srh.noaa.gov/radar/latest/DS.p19r0/si.kamx.shtml
>
>I shoulda been a forecaster. It stalled and weakened to a cat 1/2 DUD as I
>suspected.
>(bows to the adoration ..thankyou thankyou)

And precisely how much larger does this make your penis?

--------------
Beady's Corollary to Occam's Razor: "The likeliest explanation of any phenomenon is almost always the most boring one imaginable."

-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Crit request: WIP middle section
    ... I wanted to go to the bathroom, ... lilac but a vivid blue and I could see the ghosts walking through it, ... The two people who are reading it as I write are less sure. ... weird in the succeeding chapters is too abrupt so I may have to either ...
    (rec.arts.sf.composition)
  • Re: So far Titan a waste
    ... While reading in the bathroom on Sat, 07 Aug 2004 10:22:12 GMT, I saw ... that "Bob Schmall" had written: ... the conversation concerned an ascent by the Montgolfier ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: OT: Uncle Johns Bathroom Reader
    ... The Bathroom Readers kick ass. ... reading Sklansky while sitting on the can. ... I don't even want to contemplate the ramifications of reading ... Reading in the bathroom must be a man thing. ...
    (rec.gambling.poker)
  • Re: First time telescope buyer
    ... While reading in the bathroom on Sat, 16 Oct 2004 08:35:49 GMT, I saw ... that Paul Lawler had written: ... didn't suit our needs, have we? ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: First time telescope buyer
    ... While reading in the bathroom on 17 Oct 2004 21:10:37 GMT, ... saberscorpx@aol.com had written: ... "The likeliest explanation of any phenomenon is almost always the most boring one imaginable." ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)