Re: Dark adaptation on exit pupil size
From: eric bazan (boo_at_fractalfreak.com)
Date: 09/07/04
- Next message: Richard: "This is kind of interesting"
- Previous message: Joe S.: "Re: Why does God hate FLA?"
- In reply to: Bill Ferris: "Re: Dark adaptation on exit pupil size"
- Next in thread: Phil Wheeler: "Re: Dark adaptation on exit pupil size"
- Reply: Phil Wheeler: "Re: Dark adaptation on exit pupil size"
- Reply: Bill Ferris: "Re: Dark adaptation on exit pupil size"
- Reply: SaberScorpX: "Re: Dark adaptation vs. pupil size"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 7 Sep 2004 15:44:54 -0700
billferris@aol.comic (Bill Ferris) wrote in message news:<20040907104734.07582.00000295@mb-m11.aol.com>...
> canopus wrote:
> >One would expect to find a reduction in the ability to see faint stars
> >with the naked eye with age, since a reduction from 6.9mm (15 year
> >olds) to a 6.2mm (50 year olds) in average dark adapted eye pupil size
> >corresponds to about a 20% reduction in the eye's light grasp.
>
> However, dark adaptation is primarily a chemical process within the eye. The
> additional light grasp of the fully dilated eye pupil accounts for just a
> fraction of the total improved light sensitivity of the dark adapted eye. I'm
> not aware of research showing a correlation between pupil size and naked eye
> limiting magnitude among experienced observers. All the research I've seen
> points to the chemical process as the key to dark environment light
> sensitivity. So, while there may be age-related degradations of scotopic
> vision, I wouldn't assume constriction of the eye pupil to have a measurable
> impact.
>
> Regards,
>
> Bill Ferris
While it's true that most of the sensivity of the dark adapted
eye is in the retina, pupil size is important too. Going from a 7mm
to a 6mm pupil will decrease the amount of light the retina
receives by over 30%. Assuming that the sensivity of the retina does
not change (eye already full dark adapted) this could be significant.
Especially if you are observing 'naked eye' or just going for a walk
in the dark.
Animals that rely on their eyes at night tend to have large pupils -
even if they are very small. Your everage 10 pound houscat probably
can dilate its pupils to over 8mm - more than most people. Some
of the screech owls I've come across while hiking at night have
enormous pupils - larger than a persons, and these are not large
birds. An owl has an impressive retina when it comes to dark adaption -
and a large pupil to match. Birds with smaller pupils tend not
to be noturnal, again leeding some credence to the importance of
pupil size.
-Eric
- Next message: Richard: "This is kind of interesting"
- Previous message: Joe S.: "Re: Why does God hate FLA?"
- In reply to: Bill Ferris: "Re: Dark adaptation on exit pupil size"
- Next in thread: Phil Wheeler: "Re: Dark adaptation on exit pupil size"
- Reply: Phil Wheeler: "Re: Dark adaptation on exit pupil size"
- Reply: Bill Ferris: "Re: Dark adaptation on exit pupil size"
- Reply: SaberScorpX: "Re: Dark adaptation vs. pupil size"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|