Re: The Steady State Theory vs The Big Bang Theory
From: scurry (speriodthespiceorcomb_at_bresnan.net)
Date: 09/08/04
- Next message: Jan Owen: "Re: Why does God hate FLA?"
- Previous message: sheep defender: "Re: Science and Religion"
- In reply to: revdanielizzo_at_yahoo.com: "The Steady State Theory vs The Big Bang Theory"
- Next in thread: CeeBee: "Re: The Steady State Theory vs The Big Bang Theory"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2004 19:04:19 -0600
revdanielizzo@yahoo.com wrote:
Snip Suspected Rubbish (I didn't read much, just kinda scanned through
it looking for a gem. That's why I call it "Suspected")
Then I found this:
It is every bit as reasonable to
> assume that the Red Shift is caused by loss of energy of the photon
> over time as it is to assume that it is caused by a doppler effect.
Then how come stars take longer to blow up the further away um, I mean
the greater their red shift?
Snip More Rubbish.
Don't ya feel sorry for the editors of Science?
(Well no I don't either, I'm sure it didn't appear on their doorstep in
anything approaching their required format and was circular filled
before the FedEx guy/gal was out of sight.)
Shawn
- Next message: Jan Owen: "Re: Why does God hate FLA?"
- Previous message: sheep defender: "Re: Science and Religion"
- In reply to: revdanielizzo_at_yahoo.com: "The Steady State Theory vs The Big Bang Theory"
- Next in thread: CeeBee: "Re: The Steady State Theory vs The Big Bang Theory"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]