Re: Finding True North
From: Brian Tung (brian_at_isi.edu)
Date: 09/22/04
- Next message: OG: "Re: Martian "Canals'"
- Previous message: Brian Tung: "Re: NO STARHOPPING ALLOWED!!!"
- In reply to: John Beaderstadt: "Re: Finding True North"
- Next in thread: Chris L Peterson: "Re: Finding True North"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 22:14:35 +0000 (UTC)
John Beaderstadt wrote:
> Which brings us back to my point that longitude has nothing to do with
> magnetic north.
I think we understand what you mean now, but your language is unclear
(empirically, since Chris and I both misunderstood). Since I think we'll
concede that what you meant is correct, I don't understand why you feel
compelled to stick with your original wording. There is a significant
chance of reading it as
Longitude has nothing to do with how far magnetic north is from
true north on the compass.
especially as trying to figure out true north from magnetic north on the
compass is what started this thread. It certainly wasn't whether walking
to the north magnetic pole by following the compass would lead you along
a great circle or not.
Brian Tung <brian@isi.edu>
The Astronomy Corner at http://astro.isi.edu/
Unofficial C5+ Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/c5plus/
The PleiadAtlas Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/pleiadatlas/
My Own Personal FAQ (SAA) at http://astro.isi.edu/reference/faq.txt
- Next message: OG: "Re: Martian "Canals'"
- Previous message: Brian Tung: "Re: NO STARHOPPING ALLOWED!!!"
- In reply to: John Beaderstadt: "Re: Finding True North"
- Next in thread: Chris L Peterson: "Re: Finding True North"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|