Re: Off-Axis (Zero Obstruction) Reflector Telescopes
From: Guy Macon (http://www.guymacon.com)
Date: 10/04/04
- Next message: Izar187: "Re: Off-Axis (Zero Obstruction) Reflector Telescopes"
- Previous message: Jon Isaacs: "Re: Celestron NexStar 80 vs Firstscope 76"
- In reply to: Dan Chaffee: "Re: Off-Axis (Zero Obstruction) Reflector Telescopes"
- Next in thread: Ratboy99: "Re: Off-Axis (Zero Obstruction) Reflector Telescopes"
- Reply: Ratboy99: "Re: Off-Axis (Zero Obstruction) Reflector Telescopes"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2004 05:25:33 -0700
Dan Chaffee <dchaffee@blitz-it.net> says...
>The main the reason some large apertures give better images when
>stopped down is that the RMS wavefront contained in the masked area
>is far and away better than the whole surface. My first attempt at
>mirror making resulted in a 6"f 7.3 hyperboloid with a pathetic .5
>wave of overcorrection. Star testing it with a 2" mask showed a
>nearly perfect star test---certainly a high .90's strehl. My point
>is that a small section of a much larger mirror will almost always be
>DRASTICALLY better than the whole surface, unless a rolled edge
>or excessive roughness is included in the section.
>A champion wavefront on a large, fast mirror is not necessary for
>getting a very good idea of unobstructed performance from
>30-40% of the original aperture, provided the mirror's edge zone is
>not included in the mask and it's not too rough. A 16" f/4.5 with
>a reasonably smooth surface and overall strehl of .7-.8, if even that
>good, would easily do for a 6" unobstructed mask.
Good point. I could move the mask around and do tests so as
to find the best section.
A smaller hole in the mask not only gives me a better probability
of finding an excellent section, but also allows me to try more
places on the mirror. If the hole is as large as possible, I can
only rotate it, but if it's smaller, I can vary how far off-axis
I place it.
Given the low cost of a mask, I can see myself having a collection
of them with different-sizes holes, each marked with the best place
to put it on the mirror.
-- Guy Macon <http://www.guymacon.com>
- Next message: Izar187: "Re: Off-Axis (Zero Obstruction) Reflector Telescopes"
- Previous message: Jon Isaacs: "Re: Celestron NexStar 80 vs Firstscope 76"
- In reply to: Dan Chaffee: "Re: Off-Axis (Zero Obstruction) Reflector Telescopes"
- Next in thread: Ratboy99: "Re: Off-Axis (Zero Obstruction) Reflector Telescopes"
- Reply: Ratboy99: "Re: Off-Axis (Zero Obstruction) Reflector Telescopes"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|