Re: Expansion of the universe
From: Sam Wormley (swormley1_at_mchsi.com)
Date: 10/05/04
- Next message: Wfoley2: "Re: Expansion of the universe"
- Previous message: rander3127: "$10,000 for a TV NP101?"
- In reply to: Luke Valens: "Re: Expansion of the universe"
- Next in thread: Luke Valens: "Re: Expansion of the universe"
- Reply: Luke Valens: "Re: Expansion of the universe"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2004 21:15:17 GMT
Luke Valens wrote:
> Sam Wormley <swormley1@mchsi.com> wrote in message news:<gGy8d.335202$Fg5.107@attbi_s53>...
>>
>>We only see a small fraction of possibly an infinite universe.
>>
>>No Center
>> http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/nocenter.html
>>
>>Also see Ned Wright's Cosmology Tutorial
>> http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmolog.htm
>> http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmology_faq.html
>>
>>WMAP: Foundations of the Big Bang theory
>> http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_uni.html
>>
>>WMAP: Tests of Big Bang Cosmology
>> http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/m_uni/uni_101bbtest.html
>
>
> String theory tells us that the big bang could actually have been our
> "brane" bumping into another "brane", causing a release of energy.
>
There is absolutely nothing testable about string theory to date.
It is possible that it is a dead end! Time will tell.
- Next message: Wfoley2: "Re: Expansion of the universe"
- Previous message: rander3127: "$10,000 for a TV NP101?"
- In reply to: Luke Valens: "Re: Expansion of the universe"
- Next in thread: Luke Valens: "Re: Expansion of the universe"
- Reply: Luke Valens: "Re: Expansion of the universe"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
