Re: Making off-axis optics
From: Thomas Womack (twomack_at_chiark.greenend.org.uk)
Date: 10/08/04
- Next message: luca: "Eyepiece repair; where can I get it fixed?"
- Previous message: Brian Tung: "Re: Expansion of the universe"
- In reply to: Brian Tung: "Re: Making off-axis optics"
- Next in thread: Chris L Peterson: "Re: Making off-axis optics"
- Reply: Chris L Peterson: "Re: Making off-axis optics"
- Reply: Guy Macon: "Re: Making off-axis optics"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 08 Oct 2004 17:00:08 +0100 (BST)
In article <ck6bil$n7b$1@zot.isi.edu>, Brian Tung <brian@isi.edu> wrote:
>Thomas Womack wrote:
>> The ATM book I last read was very clear that you had to trepann the
>> mirror for a Cassegrain design before polishing and figuring, because
>> otherwise "released stresses" would completely ruin the figure. How
>> come this doesn't apply for producing off-axis mirrors by cutting
>> chunks cookie-cutter-style from a large paraboloid; is there some
>> physical property which makes cutting out the centre uniquely
>> damaging?
>I'm not sure, but I observe that in the case of the Cassegrain, you
>use the donut part of the mirror, whereas with the off-axis, it's the
>donut hole that you end up using. That might have something to do
>with it.
I was imagining that you'd get several (if I've got my conception of
the geometry right, six) small off-axis mirrors from one paraboloid,
so all but the first would be using the donut part too. If that's not
the case, it goes a long way to explain the pricing of OA telescopes!
Tom
- Next message: luca: "Eyepiece repair; where can I get it fixed?"
- Previous message: Brian Tung: "Re: Expansion of the universe"
- In reply to: Brian Tung: "Re: Making off-axis optics"
- Next in thread: Chris L Peterson: "Re: Making off-axis optics"
- Reply: Chris L Peterson: "Re: Making off-axis optics"
- Reply: Guy Macon: "Re: Making off-axis optics"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|