Re: Another OA Reflector
From: Mike Fitterman (cutshot_at_charter.net)
Date: 10/08/04
- Next message: Gil Violette: "Re: if you shine a flashlight back and forth across Ursa Maj tonight"
- Previous message: Mike Fitterman: "Re: Another OA Reflector"
- In reply to: Jon Isaacs: "Re: Another OA Reflector"
- Next in thread: Ratboy99: "Re: Another OA Reflector"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2004 22:13:41 GMT
"Jon Isaacs" <jonisaacs@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20041008084028.22420.00000387@mb-m06.aol.com...
> >A well executed 3.6" OA should be stiff competition for a 100mm apo on a
per
> >unit of magnification basis. Any marginal gain in brightness with the
> >additional 10mm aperture, and any gain in contrast owing to an apo
lens...
>
> You make a nice argument that the 91mm scope should not be too baldly
> outclassed by the 101mm APO. But your friend Mike went a bit further than
that
> in his statement....
>
> Consider the context of what is going on here. Ratboy was feeding your
friend
> Mike some of his own goop. Mike posted the following:
>
> "DGM's 3.6 OA actually does quite well despite it's small size. It's
> brightness and contrast was equal or better than in all cases to a TV101.
> Not nearly as wide field of view though "
I should have added to the objects I viewed both at high power.
Mike.
- Next message: Gil Violette: "Re: if you shine a flashlight back and forth across Ursa Maj tonight"
- Previous message: Mike Fitterman: "Re: Another OA Reflector"
- In reply to: Jon Isaacs: "Re: Another OA Reflector"
- Next in thread: Ratboy99: "Re: Another OA Reflector"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
