Re: I'm disappointed, why would Tom Back say this?

From: clyde crewey (clydec_at_nyc.rr.com)
Date: 10/15/04 

Date: 15 Oct 2004 05:29:18 -0700

> Clyde,
>
> I don't need to call Al to know he is a friend. You may
> have to call him to apologize for bringing this subject
> up. Al isn't like some people in the astro business,
> he doesn't sweat things like what you are doing right
> now, trying to make a mountain out of a molehill.
>
> Thomas Back

Tom,

If that's how you really feel, fine. Please don't say I brought this
subject up. A poster said out of the blue on the Astromart equipment
forum that you had said on the TMB board that the Type 2's were a copy
of the Meade's and that further, you didn't think much of the Type
2's. I at first thought he was mis-reading you and said so, but he
insisted and provided the link. So, you see the impression is out
there. I didn't give anyone the impression, that impression was
formed solely by reading your post on the TMB board, which I'll
provide in another post here. But I don't know why you wouldn't
assume that I haven't been speaking with the Naglers about this issue.
 I assure you that they are neither upset with me, nor do they think
I'm making a mountain out of a molehill.

Clyde

Loading