Re: TEC APO 160 costs $12,000 ??
From: rander3127 (rander3127_at_rogers.com)
Date: 10/16/04
- Next message: Stuart Goldman: "Sky & Telescope's News Bulletin - Oct 15"
- Previous message: rander3127: "Re: TEC APO 160 costs $12,000 ??"
- In reply to: John Boudreau: "Re: TEC APO 160 costs $12,000 ??"
- Next in thread: John Boudreau: "Re: TEC APO 160 costs $12,000 ??"
- Reply: John Boudreau: "Re: TEC APO 160 costs $12,000 ??"
- Reply: Guy Macon: "Re: TEC APO 160 costs $12,000 ??"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 22:03:10 -0400
On Sat, 16 Oct 2004 01:04:24 GMT, "John Boudreau" <jeboud@comcast.net>
wrote:
>
>"Jeff Marsh" <jeffrey.marsh4@verizon.net> wrote in message
>news:50ed606.0410151558.73383802@posting.google.com...
>> TEC is taking orders for a 160 mm APO. But TEC's price structure is
>> now a bit odd:
>>
>> APO 140 = $4,600 (F/7)
>> APO 160 = $12,000 (F/8)
>> APO 200 = $15,999 (F/9)
>>
>> It takes an extra $7400 to go from 140mm to 160mm? Wow, that's a big
>> step for 20mm. And it seems that if you would spend that much for a
>> 160 then you would go ahead and spend another $3,999 to get a 200
>> instead. Is that the idea?
>
>
>That's because the APO 160 will have a fluorite center element, not the
>FPL-53 used in the APO 140 and most of the APO 200's. Originally, the APO
>160 was to use FPL-53 and would have cost $8000.
>
>Yuri announced this on the TEC Yahoo Group a few months ago.
>
>
>John
So does the extra $4000 account for the cost of the fluorite compared
to FPL-53 or is the fluorite that much harder to work?
- Next message: Stuart Goldman: "Sky & Telescope's News Bulletin - Oct 15"
- Previous message: rander3127: "Re: TEC APO 160 costs $12,000 ??"
- In reply to: John Boudreau: "Re: TEC APO 160 costs $12,000 ??"
- Next in thread: John Boudreau: "Re: TEC APO 160 costs $12,000 ??"
- Reply: John Boudreau: "Re: TEC APO 160 costs $12,000 ??"
- Reply: Guy Macon: "Re: TEC APO 160 costs $12,000 ??"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|