Re: I'm disappointed, why would Tom Back say this?

From: clyde crewey (clydec_at_nyc.rr.com)
Date: 10/17/04 

Date: 16 Oct 2004 17:17:29 -0700

Pete Rasmussen <eye_petes@arkansas.net> wrote in message news:<dso2n0ljv69rij5bjik0gl8sf4d8mv7d65@4ax.com>...
> On 16 Oct 2004 10:57:16 GMT, jonisaacs@aol.com (Jon Isaacs) wrote:
>
>
> >Clyde is also a credible and honorable person.
>
> Based upon my own past dealing with Clyde I would tend to agree with
> these two assessments. However, to tout second-hand misinformation
> about Nagler vs Meade eyepieces is neither one. Maybe he is simply
> feeling anxious (tempermental) since the new Meades are due out in
> challenge. I've seen that human reaction here before and the criers
> were often setup by those with an evil agenda...
>
> Pete

p.s.

Why do you call my info second-hand by the way? Unless you consider
the horse's mouth second-hand.

Clyde