Re: Hey, rat! TEC 8" versus Tak 6"?
From: Joe Bergeron (jabergeron_at_earthlink.nettled)
Date: 10/17/04
- Next message: Gregory L. Hansen: "Re: OT: Historical Amnesia"
- Previous message: clyde crewey: "Re: I'm disappointed, why would Tom Back say this?"
- In reply to: Ratboy99: "Re: Hey, rat! TEC 8" versus Tak 6"?"
- Next in thread: Ratboy99: "Re: Hey, rat! TEC 8" versus Tak 6"?"
- Reply: Ratboy99: "Re: Hey, rat! TEC 8" versus Tak 6"?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 12:05:03 GMT
In article <20041016173705.07524.00002128@mb-m11.aol.com>, Ratboy99
<ratboy99@aol.comet> wrote:
> In ending it is worth noting that I have not had the Tak out even once, even
> to
> do a side by side, since having received the TEC two months ago.
Well, you may be proud of your Tak and your TEC, but I now have a Tik,
and may upgrade to a Tok, and maybe even eventually a Tuk.
-- Joe Bergeron http://www.joebergeron.com
- Next message: Gregory L. Hansen: "Re: OT: Historical Amnesia"
- Previous message: clyde crewey: "Re: I'm disappointed, why would Tom Back say this?"
- In reply to: Ratboy99: "Re: Hey, rat! TEC 8" versus Tak 6"?"
- Next in thread: Ratboy99: "Re: Hey, rat! TEC 8" versus Tak 6"?"
- Reply: Ratboy99: "Re: Hey, rat! TEC 8" versus Tak 6"?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]