Re: Celestron Meade offerings, both and neither
From: John (nospam_at_neo.rr.com)
Date: 10/19/04
- Next message: Tim Eastham: "Re: OT: Historical Amnesia"
- Previous message: Jim: "Observing report 18-10-2004 - North America in an hour"
- In reply to: Michael McCulloch: "Re: Celestron Meade offerings, both and neither"
- Next in thread: Craig M. Bobchin: "Re: Celestron Meade offerings, both and neither"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 13:28:45 GMT
"Michael McCulloch" <michaelm@nospam.invalid.net> wrote in message
news:hi19n0he1lfad1jtjiercadj88j2jkg6m7@4ax.com...
. I do have a
> complaint about the stability of the mount at high magnifications --
> say 250x and higher. There appears to be some vibration in my setup
> when tracking with the new Build 24 software.
>
> How do the CG-5GT and LXD75 function at magnifications of 250x and
> higher? Are they rock steady?
I've only used the three mounts visually. I don't notice any uneven tracking
on any of them at 250X, but I realize that it would be much more apparent if
I were imaging. I keep promising myself to make an attempt to measure PE on
all three.
I'll have to update the article after I do the firmware update.
John C
- Next message: Tim Eastham: "Re: OT: Historical Amnesia"
- Previous message: Jim: "Observing report 18-10-2004 - North America in an hour"
- In reply to: Michael McCulloch: "Re: Celestron Meade offerings, both and neither"
- Next in thread: Craig M. Bobchin: "Re: Celestron Meade offerings, both and neither"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|