Re: Meade Bashing
From: Jon Isaacs (jonisaacs_at_aol.com)
Date: 10/26/04
- Next message: Chris L Peterson: "Re: Bloody "cookies" and yahoo"
- Previous message: roblane: "Re: Off topic but weird"
- In reply to: Chris.B: "Re: Meade Bashing"
- Next in thread: Stephen Paul: "Re: Meade Bashing"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 26 Oct 2004 16:16:46 GMT
>Though I retract my "insane" generalisation in this case. My
>sympathies obviously lie with the victim and her terrible injuries. I
>still maintain that one should beware of one's own actions. Coffee is
>by its very nature hot. >One takes simple precautions against burns and
>scalds.
There is a difference between being "hot" and being unreasonably hot.
> The source of the coffee is not the problem.
The source of the coffee is the problem. Other vendors had the good sense to
take precaution against burning and scalding their customers by making sure the
coffee was served at a temperature that would not scald them.
>It is always the
>consumer's responsibilty to use a product safely.
Its is also the vendor's responsibility to assure that the product is delivered
in a safe manner.
The temperature which this coffee was poured at was 45 degrees above the
temperature McDonalds acknowledged was capable of causing burns and scalds.
That is not a safe practice IMHO.
Jon Isaacs
- Next message: Chris L Peterson: "Re: Bloody "cookies" and yahoo"
- Previous message: roblane: "Re: Off topic but weird"
- In reply to: Chris.B: "Re: Meade Bashing"
- Next in thread: Stephen Paul: "Re: Meade Bashing"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|