Re: Sunspots hit new highs
From: RichA (none_at_none.com)
Date: 10/29/04
- Next message: Mark D: "Re: New AP scope and more"
- Previous message: Mark D: "Re: Todd Gross - weatherman.com down"
- In reply to: OG: "Re: Sunspots hit new highs"
- Next in thread: OG: "Re: Sunspots hit new highs"
- Reply: OG: "Re: Sunspots hit new highs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 21:42:24 -0400
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 21:45:21 +0100, "OG" <owen@gwynnefamily.org.uk>
wrote:
>
>"RichA" <none@none.com> wrote in message
>news:nrh2o0de8ibso8i5a4euqu2engakus032e@4ax.com...
>> On 28 Oct 2004 05:08:22 GMT, Uncle Bob <realonespam@bogusnet.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >jimp@specsol-spam-sux.com wrote:
>> >> In sci.physics Sam Wormley <swormley1@mchsi.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Sunspots hit new highs (Oct 27)
>> >>> http://physicsweb.org/article/news/8/10/16
>> >>> The Sun is more active at present than it has been for over
>8000 years
>> >>> according to a new method for determining the level of sunspot
>activity
>> >>> in the past. Sami Solanki of the Max Planck Institute in
>> >>> Katlenburg-Lindau and colleagues in Finland, Germany and
>Switzerland
>> >>> have developed a technique that relates the number of sunspots
>to the
>> >>> concentration of carbon-14 in tree rings. However, the team
>insists that
>> >>> this high level of solar activity is unlikely to be the main
>cause of
>> >>> global warming (Nature 431 1084).
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Yeah, sure, it couldn't POSSIBLY be totally natural,
>uncontrollable, and
>> >> untaxable; that doesn't get research grants.
>> >>
>> > You've applied for a grant to study links between sunspot activity
>> >and global warming? Please tell us about it.
>> > Thanks,
>> > Uncle Bob
>>
>> Canada put up $70,000,000 in grant money to study global warming.
>> What was the catch? You had to be working on a project whose goal
>> was to PROVE global warming was man-made. Otherwise, no money.
>> Some kind of way to do science, huh?
>
>You got a reference for this claim?
>
Not anymore. This came up six months ago.
I thought I'd put in for some of the money, seeing
as they're entertaining any wild theory that says it's happening.
What I thought I'd base my thesis on was that is was possible to
reduce greenhouse gasses by ONLY regulating Western industry while
China and India (whose economies are rapidly industrializing) aren't
required to do any pollution control at all.
Way to go, Kyoto!
- Next message: Mark D: "Re: New AP scope and more"
- Previous message: Mark D: "Re: Todd Gross - weatherman.com down"
- In reply to: OG: "Re: Sunspots hit new highs"
- Next in thread: OG: "Re: Sunspots hit new highs"
- Reply: OG: "Re: Sunspots hit new highs"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|