Re: UO HD orthoscopics, no different?
From: Pete Rasmussen (eye_petes_at_arkansas.net)
Date: 10/29/04
- Next message: Tim Auton: "Re: New AP scope and more"
- Previous message: Pete Rasmussen: "Re: Sleeper eyepiece"
- In reply to: Bob Schmall: "Re: UO HD orthoscopics, no different?"
- Next in thread: Bob Schmall: "Re: UO HD orthoscopics, no different?"
- Reply: Bob Schmall: "Re: UO HD orthoscopics, no different?"
- Reply: Wfoley2: "Re: UO HD orthoscopics, no different?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 11:10:22 -0500
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 13:54:36 GMT, "Bob Schmall" <rschmall@wi.rr.com>
wrote:
>
>"RichA" <none@none.com> wrote in message
>news:dhl3o01p9p6qvt4pudsnuoc25v2jh7dl4q@4ax.com...
>> I'm pretty sure these eyepieces are simply the regular orthos
>> (excellent eyepieces) with new packaging. If you look at this
>> picture of the Antares orthos (simply a new flat-top version
>> of their standard orthos) from Helix Mfg, you'll see they
>> have the same undercutting as the new UO HD orthos. Only
>> difference is the red versus green lettering. What they've
>> done is gone from the old bevelled top to a flat top, added
>> a rubber eye cup and undercut the barrel. Any optical difference
>> compared to the "classic" orthos is likely not actually there.
>
>This is pure uninformed speculation, and as such is unfair. See below.
True. Rich apparenly never compared them informatively.
>> If anyone knows if they've done something new to the optics,
>> it would be interesting to hear about it.
>
>I've recently tested both the University Optics orthos, original and HD,
>against a TV Radian and AP SPL, all in 12mm focal lengths. I kept the HD and
>sold the others, not because it was orders of magnitude better, but because
>it offered comparable performance at a much lower price. The HD was better
>than the original orthos, IMHO, because the newer coatings reduced flare.
>However, as I posted in another thread, I still consider either of the
>orthos to be sleeper eyepieces.
Based on the above criteria it would be my suggestion that you
consider comparing your 12mm HD to a GSO 12mm Plossl. You would
likely be impressed with it at 1/4 the price. If you do this
comparison please also publically post your results for the other
readers.
Pete
- Next message: Tim Auton: "Re: New AP scope and more"
- Previous message: Pete Rasmussen: "Re: Sleeper eyepiece"
- In reply to: Bob Schmall: "Re: UO HD orthoscopics, no different?"
- Next in thread: Bob Schmall: "Re: UO HD orthoscopics, no different?"
- Reply: Bob Schmall: "Re: UO HD orthoscopics, no different?"
- Reply: Wfoley2: "Re: UO HD orthoscopics, no different?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|