Re: Why magazine equipment reviews suck
From: Stephen Paul (spaul219_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 10/29/04
- Next message: Canopus: "Re: Final eclipse summary"
- Previous message: T.T.: "Re: OT: Historical Amnesia"
- In reply to: Shneor Sherman: "Re: Why magazine equipment reviews suck"
- Next in thread: HAVRILIAK: "Re: Why magazine equipment reviews suck"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 16:13:13 -0400
"Shneor Sherman" <shneor@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:9dedb1fb.0410290642.61b3c6c8@posting.google.com...
> there are plenty of
> fanatics out there who believe, for example, that anything that has
> "TeleVue" stamped on it is better than anything comparable. Accurate
> reviews are not likely to change thair minds anyway.
Comparison based reviews are either for the wealthy, discriminating
observer/imager (pitting high end against high end), or the impoverished
observer (pitting low end against low end).
The middle class has Astromart. <g>
-Stephen
- Next message: Canopus: "Re: Final eclipse summary"
- Previous message: T.T.: "Re: OT: Historical Amnesia"
- In reply to: Shneor Sherman: "Re: Why magazine equipment reviews suck"
- Next in thread: HAVRILIAK: "Re: Why magazine equipment reviews suck"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]