Re: Pace of Arctic climate change sounds alarm
From: Chris.B (chris.b_at_mail.dk)
Date: 10/31/04
- Next message: RichA: "Re: Artificial Star"
- Previous message: RichA: "Now that's cute"
- In reply to: John Savard: "Re: Pace of Arctic climate change sounds alarm"
- Next in thread: Phil Wheeler: "Re: Pace of Arctic climate change sounds alarm"
- Reply: Phil Wheeler: "Re: Pace of Arctic climate change sounds alarm"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 31 Oct 2004 14:04:04 -0800
jsavard@excxn.aNOSPAMb.cdn.invalid (John Savard) wrote in message news:<4184f840.2781197@news.ecn.ab.ca>...
> Of course, one could argue that the greenhouse effect means that one
> doesn't need to worry as much about the dust kicked up by the odd
> thermonuclear warhead, but under current circumstances that is not a
> threat that could be made credible, or that anyone would want to be
> forced to act on merely for climactic reasons.
>
> John Savard
> http://home.ecn.ab.ca/~jsavard/index.html
I wonder how awful worldwide climate change needs to be. Before
America becomes the arch-enemy of the entire World. Simply in order
for the World to survive America's corrupt, parochial myopia. Your
posturing circus clowns have long outworn their sordid entertainment
value. When do the serious acts come on?
Chris.B
- Next message: RichA: "Re: Artificial Star"
- Previous message: RichA: "Now that's cute"
- In reply to: John Savard: "Re: Pace of Arctic climate change sounds alarm"
- Next in thread: Phil Wheeler: "Re: Pace of Arctic climate change sounds alarm"
- Reply: Phil Wheeler: "Re: Pace of Arctic climate change sounds alarm"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|