Re: Have refractors hurt the hobby?

From: Tom T. (ttrusock_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 11/05/04

Next message: Steve Harris sbharris_at_ROMAN9.netcom.com: "Re: Bush-Cheney 2004! VOTE Republican!"
Previous message: starlord: "Re: Opinion on Celestron xCel eyepiece"
In reply to: Jon Isaacs: "Re: Have refractors hurt the hobby?"
Next in thread: clyde crewey: "Re: Have refractors hurt the hobby?"
Reply: clyde crewey: "Re: Have refractors hurt the hobby?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]

Date: 5 Nov 2004 15:38:17 -0800

jonisaacs@aol.com (Jon Isaacs) wrote in message

<snip>

>So, I hope that rather than dismissing these scopes as junk, each of >you takes
> a second look.
><snip>
>
> Jon Isaacs

Excellent post Jon. Absolutly excellent.

Tom T.

Next message: Steve Harris sbharris_at_ROMAN9.netcom.com: "Re: Bush-Cheney 2004! VOTE Republican!"
Previous message: starlord: "Re: Opinion on Celestron xCel eyepiece"
In reply to: Jon Isaacs: "Re: Have refractors hurt the hobby?"
Next in thread: clyde crewey: "Re: Have refractors hurt the hobby?"
Reply: clyde crewey: "Re: Have refractors hurt the hobby?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]

Relevant Pages

Re: Binoculars ---> Telescope
... Jon Isaacs wrote: ... > I was just pointing out that the separation of the objectives makes no ... the distance to the objects can be taken "for all practical ...
(sci.astro.amateur)
Re: Have refractors hurt the hobby?
... > jonisaacs@aol.com (Jon Isaacs) wrote in message ... > Excellent post Jon. ... I agree with Tom T. and others, ... Clyde ...
(sci.astro.amateur)