Re: Started with a 60mm Refractor?
From: Eddie Trimarchi (eddiet_at_bigpond.net.au)
Date: 11/07/04
- Next message: Joe Bergeron: "Re: Have refractors hurt the hobby?"
- Previous message: Eddie Trimarchi: "Re: Started with a 60mm Refractor?"
- In reply to: Steve Maddison: "Re: Started with a 60mm Refractor?"
- Next in thread: Bill Becker: "Re: Started with a 60mm Refractor?"
- Reply: Bill Becker: "Re: Started with a 60mm Refractor?"
- Reply: Steve Maddison: "Re: Started with a 60mm Refractor?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2004 06:06:58 GMT
> 60mm? What luxury! My first telescope (and I use the term loosely now)
> was a Tasco 30x30mm. I recieved this scope as a gift many years ago and
30mm? Luxury! I used to have a toilet roll with a magnifying glass stuck to
one end and then because nothing was in focus, I had to imagine what the
objects looked like! :)
-- Regards, Eddie Trimarchi ~~~~~~~~~~~ http://www.astroshed.com http://www.fitsplug.com "Steve Maddison" <steve@cosam.org> wrote in message news:cmivlf$5fj$1@reader10.wxs.nl... > Jon Isaacs wrote: > > I wonder how many of you who post and lurk here started with a 60mm > > refractor or something similar? I would like to see a show of hands, > > lurkers can Email me privately... > > 60mm? What luxury! My first telescope (and I use the term loosely now) > was a Tasco 30x30mm. I recieved this scope as a gift many years ago and > don't remember doing much with it at all. The views pretty rough by > anyone's standards, but it was OK for terrestrial viewing. I was very > much into space and astronomy as a kid, but it never really occured to > me to go out and actually try to *see* any of these distant things I'd > been reading about. > > As if just over an inch of aperture wasn't small enough, it was stopped > down, too. I can't find it now to check, but I believe the objective was > at least some kind of glass, as opposed to plastic. There were no > eyepieces as such - just a small lens mounted in the end of a chromed > tube which you slid in and out to focus. IIRC, there was another lens at > the other end of this sliding tube, which resulted in an upright image. > The "mount" consisted of a foot-high tripod and some kind of plastic > clip which held the OTA in place. > > But yes - this was the one that (re)sparked the interest for me, albeit > several years later. It sat in a box somewhere in my old room at my > parents' house, until they brought it over to my new place earlier this > year. Getting a decent telescope had been in the back of my mind for a > long time, but I'd never really had the space for one until recently. > Anyway, I saw this little red scope sitting there and thought I'd try it > out on the Moon. The mount is probably still at my folks' place, so I > fashioned something resembling an alt-az mount out of shelf brackets, > screws and Blu-tak! To be honest, I could see more detail on the Moon > with my unaided eye than with the scope, but I decided right then that I > *had* to get something bigger and better. > > Not to do things by half, I went ahead and got myself an 8" SCT, which > is still opening up a whole new world for me. The last few months, I've > been making up for lost time in a big way. My only regret is that I > didn't do this a long, *long* time ago! > > -- > Steve Maddison > Den Haag, The Netherlands > http://www.cosam.org/
- Next message: Joe Bergeron: "Re: Have refractors hurt the hobby?"
- Previous message: Eddie Trimarchi: "Re: Started with a 60mm Refractor?"
- In reply to: Steve Maddison: "Re: Started with a 60mm Refractor?"
- Next in thread: Bill Becker: "Re: Started with a 60mm Refractor?"
- Reply: Bill Becker: "Re: Started with a 60mm Refractor?"
- Reply: Steve Maddison: "Re: Started with a 60mm Refractor?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|