Re: inverse-square law through geometry
From: matt (mariusrf_at_bellsouth.net)
Date: 11/08/04
- Next message: moT: "Re: WARNING: Geomagnetic K-index of 7 or greater expected"
- Previous message: Chris L Peterson: "Re: Aperture Mask Question"
- In reply to: Brian Tung: "inverse-square law through geometry"
- Next in thread: Brian Tung: "Re: inverse-square law through geometry"
- Reply: Brian Tung: "Re: inverse-square law through geometry"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2004 09:49:30 -0500
Brian Tung wrote in message ...
>Since it's cloudy here and the aurora probably couldn't be seen this
>far down anyway even if it were clear, I passed some time demonstrating,
>somewhat less than rigorously, the inverse-square law of gravity using
>only geometrical methods--without analysis, in other words. If you find
>that sort of stuff interesting (and I can't see why you would), I've
>made a short PDF of it available at
>
> http://astro.isi.edu/notes/gravity.pdf
>
>Brian Tung <brian@isi.edu>
>The Astronomy Corner at http://astro.isi.edu/
> Unofficial C5+ Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/c5plus/
> The PleiadAtlas Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/pleiadatlas/
> My Own Personal FAQ (SAA) at http://astro.isi.edu/reference/faq.txt
looks more like a tautology . You're basing it on Kepler's Laws (and some
geometry/trig ), which already include the effects of gravity . Entertaining
reading anyway, almost like an Umberto Eco novel ( seriously ) .
best regards,
matt tudor
- Next message: moT: "Re: WARNING: Geomagnetic K-index of 7 or greater expected"
- Previous message: Chris L Peterson: "Re: Aperture Mask Question"
- In reply to: Brian Tung: "inverse-square law through geometry"
- Next in thread: Brian Tung: "Re: inverse-square law through geometry"
- Reply: Brian Tung: "Re: inverse-square law through geometry"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|