Re: Meade 12.5 inch Starfinder is still available

From: Rod Mollise (rmollise_at_aol.com)
Date: 11/10/04 

Date: 10 Nov 2004 22:06:52 GMT

>Meade
>situation guided by all the negative comments I see on Meade in Cloudy
>Nights, Astromart, and SAA. Perhaps I am wrong, but there is no shortage
>of those ready to put the company down.
>

Hi:

Well, I won't argue that. And there's some truth to some of it. But a large
number of these folks will put Meade down no matter what they do or produce.
It's the fashionable thing, ya see. ;-)

Peace,
Rod Mollise
Author of _Choosing and Using a Schmidt Cassegrain Telescope_
Like SCTs and MCTs?
Check-out sct-user, the mailing list for CAT fanciers!
Goto <http://members.aol.com/RMOLLISE/index.html>

Relevant Pages

  • Re: "So which one qualifies as a bright object?"
    ... >> My point wasn't that Meade isn't guilty, ... SAA is a platform for healthy discussion about amateur ... So is THAT educating the newby? ... Again, time tells us that some of these "legitimate complaints" are, ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: "So which one qualifies as a bright object?"
    ... >>> Meade gets a reputation for litigating and badmouthing, ... > except making SAA an unpleasant place, ... How else are we going to spread ... provide the heat and ignoring their messages. ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: "So which one qualifies as a bright object?"
    ... >>> My point wasn't that Meade isn't guilty, ... SAA is a platform for healthy discussion about amateur ... So is THAT educating the newby? ... group, that is NOT an opinion, but a fact. ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: "So which one qualifies as a bright object?"
    ... My point wasn't that Meade isn't guilty, ... except making SAA an unpleasant place, ... The court system is ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: "So which one qualifies as a bright object?"
    ... >> We have folks here on SAA who appear to be dedicated to ensuring that ... >> Meade gets a reputation for litigating and badmouthing, ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
Quantcast