Re: The "It supports 100x per inch" argument
From: Mark (Mark_at_ai5.net)
Date: 11/19/04
- Next message: Mark: "Re: The Astronomer Triangle"
- Previous message: Mark: "Re: Perfect Telescope Diagram Corrected"
- In reply to: moT: "Re: The "It supports 100x per inch" argument"
- Next in thread: CHASLX200: "Re: The "It supports 100x per inch" argument"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 01:56:57 -0600
moT wrote:
> > ******************************
> > I have a old 80's Black C-8 OTA, and it will handle 400x with ease! Even
> 550x
> > does well in this scope, thats when is seeing very good. Guess i got a
> hot
> > C-8, i've owned about 10 others, and they dont come close!!!
> >
> > Chas P.
>
> I have NEVER seen a BLACK C-8. The C-8 from the 80's is the standard
> off orange or whatever you call it and ALWAYS has been. Unless you or
> others know
> something that most don't and have seen other Astronomy Magazines from the
> "good ol 80's"
> that others haven't, lay your proof here for all to see.
Get glasses and cease using "averted imagination" immediately!
Mark
- Next message: Mark: "Re: The Astronomer Triangle"
- Previous message: Mark: "Re: Perfect Telescope Diagram Corrected"
- In reply to: moT: "Re: The "It supports 100x per inch" argument"
- Next in thread: CHASLX200: "Re: The "It supports 100x per inch" argument"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
