Re: Celestron's dubious claim
From: Jim Coughlin (woodwrench_at_aol.com)
Date: 11/21/04
- Next message: Mook: "Re: so called new approach to design doublet APOs. ;>)"
- Previous message: Mook: "Re: Lost account at Astromart"
- In reply to: RichA: "Re: Celestron's dubious claim"
- Next in thread: Deborah Martin: "Re: Celestron's dubious claim"
- Reply: Deborah Martin: "Re: Celestron's dubious claim"
- Reply: RichA: "Re: Celestron's dubious claim"
- Reply: Bill Becker: "Re: Celestron's dubious claim"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 20 Nov 2004 23:17:53 -0800
RichA <none@none.com> wrote in message
>
> Question still stands. If a one-armed scope is so steady
> (and it's not, anyone remember the C5+?)
I remember the Quantum Maksutov.
Jim
- Next message: Mook: "Re: so called new approach to design doublet APOs. ;>)"
- Previous message: Mook: "Re: Lost account at Astromart"
- In reply to: RichA: "Re: Celestron's dubious claim"
- Next in thread: Deborah Martin: "Re: Celestron's dubious claim"
- Reply: Deborah Martin: "Re: Celestron's dubious claim"
- Reply: RichA: "Re: Celestron's dubious claim"
- Reply: Bill Becker: "Re: Celestron's dubious claim"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|